Fashions for sport and evening wear, all made from Bemberg rayon. Narration: Muriel Evans. Photography: William Steiner. Art Director: Alfred Pan(?). Sound Engineer: Walter Hicks. Production Manager: S.E. Harrison. With Dorothy Fa(?) (Carol); Francis Goodwin (Jane); Ruth Bra(?) (Alice); Ann Rountree (Gloria); Marjorie Hawthorne (Patsy); Bette Miller (Martha); Helen Dillard. Fashion Director: Tobe. In Technicolor.
I understand the importance of preserving this type of film. However, this one gets a BOMB as far as historical value is concerned. Few REAL people dressed like this, and the whole film is painfully out of touch with the mainstream public. In 1940, America had barely left the great depression. While many dressed their best while remaining within their limited finances (as seen in home movies from the time), this kind of fashion would not be of any use to the average person.
To make matters worse, the designs of the clothing are hardly typical of the time.
Rick Prelinger has many MUCH BETTER films than this garbage, which give better examples of late-1930's/earlt 1940's clothing styles.
I only give it three stars for the glorious colour photography.
P.S. The previous reviewer says we've come a long way: Sorry, but to future generations, I'd like to note that today's advertising is full of even more bullshit than this garbage.
March 27, 2009 Subject:
Reflection of the Time
This marketing movie for Bemberg Rayon is facinating if it was indeed filmed in 1940. Bemberg today, as was the case in 1940, a Japanese held company, with its first commercial production in Germany in 1897.
In 1940, Japan, Germany and Italy signed the Tripartite Pact. By signing the Pact, the three nations agreed that for the next ten years they would "stand by and co-operate with one another in... their prime purpose to establish and maintain a new order of things... to promote the mutual prosperity and welfare of the peoples concerned."
The unsuspecting "patriotic" American woman quite possibly had no idea that their new fabric was produced by countries in the Axis.
The fashions and naivety are a reflection of marketing schemes used during that time period. Viewers should take into consideration that then, even as now, marketing tools are not a true reflection of society. Rather, it's a reflection of how crappy and unsophisticated marketing strategy was in the 40s. We've come along way baby...and be glad that we have!
Reviewer:amor erotica -
February 21, 2009 Subject:
Put a girl in a dress surrounded by others girls in dresses and girlishness breaks out. Any female who doesn't accept or understand this has no understanding of human nature... so the modern woman, sneering at such girly nonsense, impresses us all with her lack of self-knowledge. Femaleness and femininity go hand in hand. The femininity of today is no different to that of 70 years ago - the only difference is pseudo-intellectuals masquerading as social commentators who at every opportunity damn everything that makes interaction between the sexes pleasurable... If women didn't enjoy it, they wouldn't still act this way.
"Among the basic joys of human existence is the division into sexes, the difference between male and female, between you and me, even between mine and yours, and these are extremely pleasant and satisfying divisions, or could be; their elimination would not just be insane, but also a nightmare — the peak of repression." Herbert Marcuse
April 6, 2007 Subject:
a round of tennis and not one pit stain on these gals. rayon is unmerciful as I recall..ah, great film, reminding me of why I didnt want to grow up and be an adult back in the 50s, because my mother wore these clothes to church. Who can forget the crinkly crackle of rayon , the persistent itch , the high aroma of chemicals permeating your nasal cavity, bows the size of basketballs, and lacy bric a brac scratching at your skin like a hair shirt..hilarious film.
April 6, 2004 Subject:
Worst. Clothes. Ever.
Wow! The worst clothes ever (!) are modeled by a bunch of prancing ninnies who look like they had their faces shot with a makeup gun. Features an incredibly inane script, surreal colors, absurd sets and more, in just ten minutes time. And something tells me that BEMBERG Rayon is mighty itchy...
January 15, 2004 Subject:
Forties Fashion Statement
I liked this forties clip for its camp value and its glimpse of the fashions of a different time period. The particular clothes showcased here are certainly not the best the forties had to offer, but it was amusing to see the way they were advertised back then, using these models and the vacuous plotline.
[Note: I wonder how the previous reviewer associated this movie with drag queens, and why the one before her called the narration "gay". The narrator was a woman (there were no men in the entire movie). She did use the word "gay" profusely, but the word "gay" did not mean "homosexual" back in the forties! It's pretty clear that the feminine attire advertised here was marketed to women using women as models. There was absolutely nothing concerning drag queens in this movie. Have today's women become so masculinized that we are now to consider anything feminine as relating to transvestites or gays rather than to women???]
My, fashions are certainly gay this summer! Many a drag queen could take tips in "femininity" from this incredibly stupid and shallow 40s fashion film, featuring BEMBERG rayon. A bunch of very shallow and silly upperclass women frolic at a club in incredibly ugly, gaudy rayon clothes. I don't know which is stupiderthe narration, the silly "plot" involving "feminine scheming", or the loud "fashions", featuring such elements as stripes only a football referee could love, bows and collars of a size usually seen on cartoon characters, or snoods, a brief 40s headwear fad that's as ugly as its name implies and which thankfully didn't catch on. The dialogue is a scream, featuring whole passages a drag queen would be proud of. Example: "He found out from the caddy." "Oh no! You mean Vivian?" "No, silly, the golf caddy!" Somebody ought to put these gals out of their misery. This film is, of course, incredibly ripe for msting. Have fun with it on "Ladies Night".
Ratings: Camp/Humor Value: *****. Weirdness: ****. Historical Interest: ****. Overall Rating: ****.
December 29, 2002 Subject:
My, what a handsome bag, just like a binocular case!
In this gonzo short, the fashions of 1930's-1940's are showcased.. But not just any old clothes. These are BENBERG rayon! (note the caps). These are HIDEOUS fashions folks, ugly stripes. dresses that look like table cloths, weird looking hats and that ever so gay narration makes this short a VERY strange viewing experience.
Fashions for active sport and evening wear.
Everything made from Bemberg rayon.
Narrated by a woman fashion commentator in patronizing, but humorous way, in spirit of old fashion newsreels.
Woman talking into old white telephone receiver to a man (old Hollywood accent)
Making some kind of a country date
2 girls hug one another
Narrator talks to them about stripes, then begins to describe their outfits
CU woman putting on black and white open shoes
Women chattering social irrelevancies
Many great shots, pans down and close-ups of rayon fashions
MS 6 women lined up looking to left, presumably looking at men with great attention (but we don't see the men)
Lots of narration about 'gay' fashions
4 women come to examine another's engagement ring: 'Wish you had one?'
'Patsy looks like a peppermint stick in her red and white candy stripe.'
'women flock to the engagement ring like bees to the honeysuckle'
Film cuts out early:
Up to but not including: 'Helen has an idea, and itÕs about Leap Year'